Multi-objective Search Algorithm
Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm (Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm) will be an algorithm for optimizing multiple objective functions simultaneously. Multi-objective optimization aims to find a balanced solution (Pareto optimal solution set) among multiple optimal solutions rather than a single optimal solution, and such problems have been applied to many complex systems and decision-making problems in the real world.
The main characteristics of multi-objective search algorithms are as follows
1. multiple objective functions: In multi-objective optimization, two or more objective functions are defined. These objective functions may conflict, and optimizing one may worsen the other.
2. Pareto-optimal solution: A solution in the solution space is Pareto-optimal if there is no room for improvement in all objective functions. Pareto optimal solutions are ranked in terms of their superiority over other solutions.
3. Maintain diversity: Multi-objective algorithms maintain solution diversity and search for as many solutions as possible within the Pareto optimal solution set. This provides solutions that can accommodate decision makers with different priorities and requirements.
4. non-inferior solution set: The multi-objective optimization algorithm tries to find a set of non-inferior solutions (solutions that are superior to other solutions, but none of them are inferior). This non-inferior solution set is the Pareto optimal solution set.
Typical multi-objective search algorithms include
- NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II): NSGA-II is a type of genetic algorithm that combines sorting and selection of non-inferior solutions to efficiently find a set of non-inferior solutions.
- MOEA/D (Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm based on Decomposition): MOEA/D is a method that divides a multi-objective optimization problem into subproblems and performs optimization for each subproblem.
- NSGA-III: NSGA-III is an improved version of NSGA-II, which performs multi-objective optimization by considering the density and distribution of non-inferior solutions.
- SPEA2 (Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2): SPEA2 is a method for evaluating the strength of non-inferior solutions and selecting a set of non-inferior solutions.
- MOPSO (Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization): MOPSO is an algorithm that extends particle swarm optimization to multi-objective optimization, in which particles search within a set of non-inferior solutions.
Multi-objective search algorithms are used in many domains and can be useful tools in a variety of applications, including design optimization, economics decision making, engineering, evolutionary machine learning, and power supply optimization. These algorithms can also be customized to the nature of the problem and are widely used as part of evolutionary computation.
Specific steps of the multi-objective search algorithm
This section describes the specific steps of the Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm (MOOG). The following are the basic steps of a typical multi-objective optimization algorithm.
1. Initialization:
- Generate a random population and evaluate multiple objective functions for each individual.
- The size of the initial population and the method of generation are set according to the problem.
2. Non-Dominated Sorting:
- Identifies non-inferior solutions (Pareto-optimal solutions) within the generated population.
- For each individual, it checks whether it is superior to other individuals and determines whether it is included in the set of non-inferior solutions.
3 Selection:
- Individuals are selected from the non-inferiority solution set. Typically, methods such as ranking, tournament selection, roulette selection, etc. are used for selection.
- Equality may be considered in selection to maintain diversity within the non-inferiority set.
4. crossover:
- The genetic information of selected individuals is crossed to generate new individuals. Crossover operations are performed with caution because they can affect multiple objective functions.
5. mutation:
- Mutation is applied to a subset of individuals to encourage the search for new solutions. Mutation helps maintain diversity and escape from local solutions.
6. next generation formation:
- Combination of selection, crossover, and mutation to form new populations.
Ensure that individuals in the new population are included in the Pareto optimal solution set.
7 Convergence Check:
- The algorithm terminates when convergence conditions are met (e.g., a certain number of generations, a solution close enough to the target solution is found, etc.). Convergence conditions depend on the problem.
8. Result Output:
- The final set of non-inferior solutions is output and the user selects the optimal solution.
9. Iteration:
- Repeat the process from step 3 to step 8 above. The multi-objective algorithm is executed in multiple generations to improve the set of non-inferior solutions and increase the number of solutions included in the Pareto optimal solution set.
There are various methods for efficiently finding the non-inferior solution set in multi-objective search algorithms, NSGA-II, MOEA/D, and SPEA2 are the best examples. Depending on the nature and goals of the problem, it is important to design the selection, crossover, and mutation operations appropriately to ensure diversity and evenness of the final solution.
Example implementation of a multi-objective search algorithm
An example implementation of a multi-objective search algorithm is presented. Here, we use Python to implement NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) NSGA-II is one of the leading algorithms for solving multi-objective optimization problems.
import random
# Gene length (number of individual dimensions)
gene_length = 10
# Population size
population_size = 100
# Number of generations
generations = 100
# Number of objective functions
num_objectives = 2
# Objective Function Definition
def objective_function(individual):
# This is where the individual is evaluated. For example, if you want to minimize two objective functions:.
# Objective function 1: Sum of individual elements
# Objective function 2: Average of individual elements
return sum(individual), sum(individual) / len(individual)
# Generation of individuals
def create_individual():
return [random.random() for _ in range(gene_length)]
# NSGA-II implementation
def nsga2():
population = [create_individual() for _ in range(population_size)]
for generation in range(generations):
# Sort populations by non-inferiority solution
population = sorted(population, key=lambda x: objective_function(x))
# Extract front of non-inferiority solution
fronts = []
current_front = []
for ind in population:
if not current_front or objective_function(ind) == objective_function(current_front[0]):
current_front.append(ind)
else:
fronts.append(current_front)
current_front = [ind]
if current_front:
fronts.append(current_front)
# Formation of the next generation (selection and crossover)
new_population = []
for i in range(population_size):
parents = random.choices(fronts, k=2) # Tournament Selection
parent1, parent2 = parents[0][random.randint(0, len(parents[0]) - 1)], parents[1][random.randint(0, len(parents[1]) - 1)]
child = crossover(parent1, parent2)
new_population.append(child)
# Apply mutations
for i in range(population_size):
if random.random() < mutation_rate:
mutate(new_population[i])
population = new_population
# Returns the final non-inferiority solution set
return fronts[0]
# (genetic) crossing over
def crossover(parent1, parent2):
crossover_point = random.randint(1, gene_length - 1)
child = parent1[:crossover_point] + parent2[crossover_point:]
return child
# mutation
def mutate(individual):
mutation_point = random.randint(0, gene_length - 1)
individual[mutation_point] = random.random()
# execution
mutation_rate = 0.01
pareto_front = nsga2()
print("Pareto optimal solution set:")
for ind in pareto_front:
print("Objective 1:", objective_function(ind)[0])
print("Objective 2:", objective_function(ind)[1])
This code serves as an example of a basic implementation of the NSGA-II algorithm for solving a multi-objective optimization problem that minimizes two objective functions; NSGA-II sorts non-inferior solutions and uses tournament selection, crossover, and mutation to form new generations.
Challenges of Multi-objective Search Algorithms
Although multi-objective search algorithms are often powerful tools for finding a useful set of optimal solutions, several challenges and limitations exist. The following are some of the challenges of multi-objective search algorithms.
1. increased computational cost: If the evaluation of the objective function is complex or time-consuming, the computational cost of the multi-objective search algorithm can be high. The number of evaluations required to find a solution increases, which in turn increases the execution time.
2. maintaining diversity of non-inferior solutions: Multi-objective algorithms need to maintain diversity of non-inferior solutions (Pareto optimal solutions). Some algorithms place too much emphasis on equality and may overlook other non-inferior solutions.
3. parameter selection: There are several parameters in multi-objective algorithms, and it can be difficult to set these parameters appropriately; for example, how to set the selection pressure and mutation rate is important.
4. application to high-dimensional problems: As the dimensionality of the objective function increases, the search for solutions becomes more difficult, and non-inferior solutions are less likely to exist in high-dimensional spaces, requiring appropriate algorithms and strategies.
5. handling constraints: It can be difficult to deal with multi-objective optimization problems with constraints. Methods are needed to find non-inferior solutions while minimizing constraint violations.
6. trade-off between convergence and diversity: Algorithm evolution faces a trade-off between convergence and diversity. Convergence creates clusters of non-inferior solutions and may lead to loss of diversity.
7. problem-dependence: The performance of multi-objective algorithms depends on the problem. An algorithm may be effective on a particular problem, but may not perform well when applied to another problem.
8. objective function conflict: When objective functions conflict with each other, for example, minimizing one maximizes the other, defining and searching for non-inferior solutions can be difficult.
Algorithm improvements and customizations are needed to address these challenges. It may also be useful to combine it with other variants of evolutionary computation or meta-heuristics to find appropriate solutions to the challenges.
Solutions and Developments in Multi-objective Search Algorithm Challenges
Some general solutions and developments for solving the challenges of multi-objective search algorithms are described.
1. solutions to the increase in computational cost:
- Use of approximate models: When the evaluation cost of the objective function is high, an approximate model of the objective function can be used to reduce the evaluation cost. This is done by evaluating the individuals via the approximate model and performing the expensive actual evaluation only when necessary.
2. measures to maintain diversity of non-inferior solutions:
- Multi-objective selection algorithm: Improve the selection strategy of the multi-objective algorithm and design it to maintain an even set of non-inferior solutions. An example is an algorithm such as NSGA-III.
3. parameter selection coping strategies:
- Automatic hyperparameter optimization: use automatic tuning methods for hyperparameters (selection pressure, mutation rate, etc.) to search for appropriate parameter settings.
4. solutions for application to high dimensional problems:
- Dimensionality reduction: Dimensionality reduction techniques (e.g., principal component analysis) may be used to facilitate the search for solutions in high-dimensional spaces. Extensions and variants of multiobjective algorithms may also be considered.
5. measures to deal with constraints:
- Penalty function: One way to minimize constraint violations is to introduce a penalty function. This optimizes the objective function while preferring solutions that do not violate the constraints.
6. trade-off between convergence and diversity:
- Introducing the archive concept: diversity can be maintained by introducing an archive that stores past non-inferior solutions. Solutions in the archive can be reused to find new non-inferior solutions.
7. measures to cope with problem dependence:
- Use of domain knowledge: By incorporating domain knowledge of the problem into the algorithm, problem-specific algorithms can be designed. This is accomplished by defining the appropriate objective function and selection strategy for the problem.
8. strategies for dealing with objective function conflicts:
- Adjustment of objective functions: To reduce conflicts between objective functions, they can be redefined or new objective functions can be introduced.
Advanced Algorithm:
- Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO): an algorithm that extends particle swarm optimization to multi-objective optimization, where particles search within a set of non-inferior solutions.
- Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (MODE): A differential evolution algorithm applied to multi-objective optimization, which combines the search for non-inferior solutions with the maintenance of diversity.
- Evolutionary strategy: An algorithm that applies evolutionary strategy to multi-objective optimization also exists, and can be used in combination with NSGA-II and other algorithms.
Reference Information and Reference Books
For general machine learning algorithms including search algorithms, see “Algorithms and Data Structures” or “General Machine Learning and Data Analysis.
“Algorithms” and other reference books are also available.
コメント