Weight reduction of models through pruning, quantization, etc.
Model lightening is an important technique for converting deep learning models to smaller, faster, and more energy efficient models, and there are various approaches to model lightening, including pruning and quantization There are various approaches to model weight reduction, including pruning and quantization.
1. Pruning:
Pruning is a method of removing useless parameters (usually small weights or connections) in the model. This reduces the size of the model and decreases computational complexity. Common pruning algorithms include the following
-
- Setting weights to zero if the absolute value of the weights is below a threshold value.
- Removing unimportant neurons and deleting their input-output connections.
- Use clustering to group similar weights and replace weights using the average of some clusters.
Pruning has the advantage of reducing model weight and increasing inference speed. However, it must be carefully tuned as it may introduce noise during training.
2. Quantization:
Quantization is the process of expressing model weights and activations in a lower bit width, typically from floating point numbers (32 bits) to integers (e.g., 8 bits). This reduces the memory usage and computational cost of the model.
-
- Weight quantization: Rounding the weights in the model to integer values.
- Activation quantization: quantifies the input and intermediate activations in the model.
Quantization contributes to reducing model weight and increasing inference speed. However, there is a loss of accuracy, so it is important to select the optimal bit width.
These techniques are promising methods for successfully reducing model weight, but caution is required. When applying pruning and quantization, it is important to evaluate the impact on model performance and select appropriate hyperparameters and settings. In addition, detailed investigation and experimentation is required, as the optimal approach will vary depending on the task of the model.
Algorithms used to reduce model weight through pruning, quantization, etc.
The following is an overview of pruning and quantization algorithms and specific methods.
1. Pruning: Common pruning algorithms include the following
-
- Weight Pruning: If the absolute value of a weight is less than a threshold value, the weight is set to zero.
- Neuron Pruning: remove unimportant neurons and their input/output connections.
- Cluster Pruning: Cluster the weights and replace them using the average of some clusters.
Pruning can be applied during training or after training, and it is common to use a regularization term to control pruning during training.
2. Quantization: Common quantization methods include
-
- Weight Quantization: Rounding the weights in the model to integer values.
- Activation Quantization: quantizes the input and intermediate activations in the model.
Quantization is typically applied after training, and the choice of bit width has a significant impact on accuracy and effectiveness. Quantized models work well with hardware acceleration and edge devices.
3. distillation: Distillation is a method of transferring knowledge from a large model (teacher model) to a smaller model (student model). Probability distributions and activations generated from the teacher model are used to train the student model and optimize it. This can achieve both model weight reduction and performance improvement.
4. deep learning reduction: Model weight reduction can be achieved by simplifying the model architecture itself. Deep learning reduction techniques include the use of lightweight model architectures such as MobileNet (described in “About MobileNet“) and SqueezeNet (described in “About SqueezeNet“).
These algorithms are common techniques used to reduce model weight, and these techniques can be combined or customized depending on the specific project or task. Experimentation and evaluation will be essential to select the appropriate approach.
Application of model weight reduction through pruning, quantization, etc.
Model lightweighting techniques are especially useful in resource-constrained environments and implementations on edge devices. The following are examples of applications of model weight reduction techniques such as pruning and quantization.
1. Mobile Applications:
Model size and computational cost are important for inference of deep learning models on mobile devices. Pruning and quantization can be used to reduce the weight of models embedded in mobile applications, thereby reducing application download size and improving real-time performance.
2. edge devices:
Edge devices (e.g., embedded devices, robots, self-driving cars) may have tight resource constraints when processing sensor data and vision tasks. Model lightweighting techniques can help these devices run high-performance deep learning models, such as quantization, for which they are particularly well suited.
3. web applications:
Web applications are concerned with improving the user experience, and pruning and quantization can be used to increase the inference speed and responsiveness of deep learning models running within web applications.
4. speech processing:
Model lightweighting is especially important for on-device speech recognition and speech synthesis systems. Real-time processing of speech data is computationally expensive, making model weight reduction a feasible task.
5. robotics: Robotics:
Robotics applications require execution of deep learning models on constrained hardware, and pruning and quantization can be used to improve computational efficiency in robot control and sensor data interpretation.
In these cases, the use of model lightweighting techniques can reduce model size and computational cost while maintaining performance.
Examples of implementations of model weight reduction through pruning, quantization, etc.
Below are some simple examples of implementations of pruning, quantization, and other techniques. The specific implementation depends on the framework or library used, but here we describe some general ideas.
Pruning implementation examples:
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.optim as optim
# Model Definition
class MyModel(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(MyModel, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = nn.Linear(784, 512)
self.fc2 = nn.Linear(512, 10)
def forward(self, x):
x = torch.relu(self.fc1(x))
x = self.fc2(x)
return x
model = MyModel()
# pruning
def prune_model(model, pruned_percentage=0.5):
parameters_to_prune = (
(model.fc1, 'weight'),
(model.fc2, 'weight')
)
for module, name in parameters_to_prune:
prune.l1_unstructured(module, name, amount=pruned_percentage)
prune.remove(module, name)
# Apply pruning
prune_model(model, pruned_percentage=0.5)
# Save the model after pruning
torch.save(model.state_dict(), 'pruned_model.pth')This example implements pruning using PyTorch, using the torch.nn.utils.prune module to apply pruning to specified parameters of the model and remove unwanted parameters.
Example implementation of Quantization:.
import torch
import torch.quantization
# Model Definition
class MyModel(torch.nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(MyModel, self).__init__()
self.fc1 = torch.nn.Linear(784, 512)
self.fc2 = torch.nn.Linear(512, 10)
def forward(self, x):
x = torch.relu(self.fc1(x))
x = self.fc2(x)
return x
model = MyModel()
# Apply quantization
model = torch.quantization.quantize_dynamic(model, {torch.nn.Linear}, dtype=torch.qint8)
# Save the model after quantization
torch.save(model.state_dict(), 'quantized_model.pth')This example uses PyTorch and uses the torch.quantization module to quantize the model. The model is converted to integer quantization (e.g. torch.qint8) to reduce memory usage and computational cost.
The challenges of lightweighting models through pruning, quantization, etc.
While model lightening methods such as pruning and quantization provide model size reduction and increased inference speed, they also come with some challenges and limitations. The challenges of these methods are described below.
Challenges of pruning:
1. need for retraining: Pruning is usually applied after training the model and setting the pruned parameters to zero. The model then needs to be retrained, which is time and resource intensive.
2. Loss of accuracy: Pruning can remove important information from the model. Therefore, excessive pruning may adversely affect model accuracy.
3. Hyperparameter adjustment: Pruning requires adjustment of hyperparameters (e.g., proportions, thresholds, etc.), and many experiments are needed to find the optimal hyperparameters.
Quantization Challenges:
1. loss of accuracy: Quantization involves a loss of information from floating point numbers to integers, and reducing the bit width may reduce the accuracy of the model. Choosing the appropriate bit width is important.
2. hardware requirements: Specific hardware or accelerators may be required to run quantized models at high speed. If the hardware is not suitable for quantization, implementation may be difficult.
3. difficulty with quantization: Quantization implementation requires design and code changes to properly map model calculations to integer values. This would require additional effort.
Addressing the issue of model weight reduction through pruning, quantization, etc.
Several methods and best practices exist to address the challenges associated with model weight reduction methods. These are discussed below.
How to deal with pruning:
1. Retraining and Fine Tuning: By setting the weights removed by pruning to zero, the model loses accuracy. Retraining and fine tuning are commonly used to recover model performance, retrain on training data, and adjust the deleted parameters.
2. avoid excessive pruning: Excessive pruning can cause loss of accuracy, so an appropriate pruning ratio should be selected, and cross-validation or other methods can be used to help find the right ratio.
How to deal with Quantization:
1. choosing the right bit width: In quantization, choosing the right bit width can help minimize the impact on accuracy. Typically, an 8-bit integer (int8) is a balanced choice, but the appropriate bit width depends on the task and model. 2.
2. custom hardware and acceleration: To run quantized models faster, specific hardware and accelerators may be used. Hardware acceleration can enable faster inference of the model and compensate for the performance loss due to quantization.
General Strategies:
1. evaluation and hyperparameter tuning: evaluate performance before and after applying model lightening techniques, tune appropriate hyperparameters to address challenges, and leverage cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization
2. Knowledge Distillation: Evaporation can be a way to improve models whose performance has been degraded by pruning or quantization. Information learned from large scale teacher models can be transferred to student models to improve performance.
3. Hybrid approaches: Combining pruning, quantization, and other weight reduction techniques can reduce size and computational cost while maintaining model performance.
4. Cost modeling: Before executing a model weight reduction technique, it is helpful to evaluate target performance metrics and resource constraints and build a cost model to help select the optimal technique.
Reference Information and Reference Books
For reference information, see “General Machine Learning and Data Analysis” “Small Data Learning, Combining Logic and Machine Learning, Local/Group Learning,” and “Machine Learning with Sparsity”
For Reference book “
“
“
“
1. “Deep Learning for Computer Vision with Python” by Adrian Rosebrock
2. “Model Compression and Acceleration for Deep Neural Networks: The Principles, Progress, and Practices” by Yu Cheng et al.
3. “An Overview of Neural Network Compression”
4. “Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks” by Vivienne Sze et al.
5. “Practical Deep Learning for Cloud, Mobile, and Edge” by Anirudh Koul et al.
6. “Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Network” (Hinton et al., 2015)
7. “Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Coding” (Han et al., 2015)
8. “Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference” (Jacob et al., 2017)
コメント