Physical Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) Overview
Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a combination of data-driven machine learning approaches and physical modelling, using neural networks to model physical phenomena such as continuum mechanics and fluid dynamics, and numerical solution methods to approximate the equations. The system will be able to approximate the equations. An overview of PINNs is given below.
1. physically informed: PINNs are referred to as ‘physically informed’. This refers to the feature that neural networks are trained based on physical equations. Unlike the usual data-driven approach, the physical laws are incorporated into the model learning process.
2. data-driven: PINNs are a type of data-driven approach. It has the ability to learn from observational data and boundary conditions and make predictions in unknown domains, and PINNs utilise information from the physical equations to estimate solutions, even when the data is incomplete.
3. integration of physical models: PINNs combine data with physical models using neural networks to find solutions that satisfy the physical equations. This allows the complex behaviour of physical phenomena to be captured.
4. approximation of numerical solutions: PINNs is also used to numerically solve partial differential equations in continuum mechanics and fluid dynamics. By using neural networks to find approximate solutions to the equations, they provide a highly efficient and scalable numerical solution method.
5. areas of application: PINNs have been applied to a wide variety of physical phenomena and engineering problems. Examples include fluid mechanics problems, materials science, heat transfer analysis and structural analysis, where PINNs provides a more efficient and flexible modelling approach compared to existing methods.
PINNs combines the advantages of both physical modelling and machine learning, making it an effective method for analysing and predicting complex problems.
Algorithms related to physically informed neural networks (PINNs)
The basic algorithm of PINNs is outlined below.
1. definition of the loss function: in PINNs, a loss function is defined to assess how close the approximate solution of the physical equations is to the actual solution. In general, it includes the following terms
Loss of physics term: this is the term that ensures that the neural network satisfies the physical equations. This represents the residuals of the partial differential equations.
Loss of data term: this will be the term that ensures that the neural network satisfies the observed data and boundary conditions. This represents the difference between the observed data and the output of the neural network.
2. neural network construction: in PINNs, neural networks are constructed to approximate the solution of the physical equations. Typically, architectures such as multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used.
3. back-propagation-based optimisation: to learn the parameters of the neural network, a back-propagation algorithm is used to minimise the loss function. This allows the neural network to find the optimal parameters for finding a solution that satisfies the physical equations.
4. incorporation of the physical equations: information from the physical equations is directly incorporated when defining the loss function. This allows the neural network to learn the physical equations and reproduce the physical behaviour appropriately.
5. integration of data-driven and physical modelling: PINNs allow the integration of data-driven approaches and physical modelling. This allows both observational data and physical equations to be used for analysis and prediction.
Application of Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs).
Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have been applied to various physical phenomena and engineering problems. The following are examples of applications of PINNs.
1. fluid dynamics: PINNs have been used to predict flow fields and fluid behaviour. Examples include the analysis of fluid velocity fields and pressure distributions, aerodynamic analysis and the estimation of flow boundary conditions, which can be performed with PINNs with greater flexibility and higher efficiency than conventional numerical fluid dynamics methods.
2. structural analysis: in structural analysis, PINNs are used to predict the stress distribution and deformation of objects and structures. Examples include predicting the stress response of materials, analysing the strength of structures and assessing their seismic performance, where PINNs can be used for analyses that are faster and more flexible than conventional methods based on finite element methods and analytical solutions.
3. heat transfer analysis: in heat transfer analysis, PINNs are used to predict the temperature distribution and heat fluxes of objects and materials. Examples include analysing heat transfer problems, estimating the thermal conductivity of materials and assessing the effect of stresses due to heat transfer, where PINNs can be used to perform efficient analyses for complex geometries and boundary conditions.
4. medical engineering: in the field of medical engineering, PINNs are used for stress response and heat conduction analysis of biological tissues and for processing medical images. Examples include stress analysis of the human skeleton and joints, simulation of thermal processing of biological tissue, and processing and analysis of medical images, where PINNs enable more accurate analysis and prediction, contributing to improved medical technology.
5. materials science: in the field of materials science, PINNs are used to design new materials and predict material properties. Examples include predicting the strength and stiffness of materials, analysing the stress response of materials and assessing the fatigue behaviour of materials, where PINNs can be used to gain a more detailed understanding of material properties and behaviour, enabling new materials to be developed and improved.
PINNs offers a new approach to a range of problems through the integration of data-driven machine learning and physical modelling.
Example implementation of Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs)
Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a data-driven approach to partial differential equations (PDEs). It uses data to solve PDEs, allowing for faster and more flexible analysis than traditional numerical methods. A basic implementation of PINNs using Python and TensorFlow is shown below.
First, install the necessary libraries.
pip install tensorflow numpy matplotlibNext, PINNs are implemented.
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Definition of partial differential equations
def pde(x, u):
# We now define the partial differential equation
return tf.gradients(u, x)[0] - some_function_of(u)
# initial conditions
def initial_condition(x):
# Define initial conditions here
return some_function_of(x)
# boundary condition
def boundary_condition(x):
# Boundary conditions are defined here
return some_function_of(x)
# Definition of a neural network
class PINN(tf.keras.Model):
def __init__(self):
super(PINN, self).__init__()
self.dense1 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(50, activation='tanh')
self.dense2 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(50, activation='tanh')
self.dense3 = tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation=None)
def call(self, inputs):
x = inputs
x = self.dense1(x)
x = self.dense2(x)
x = self.dense3(x)
return x
# Data generation
x_data = np.linspace(0, 1, 100)[:, None]
u_data = initial_condition(x_data)
# Initialisation of neural networks
model = PINN()
# optimisation
optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=0.001)
# learning
epochs = 10000
for epoch in range(epochs):
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
u_pred = model(x_data)
pde_loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(pde(x_data, u_pred)))
boundary_loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(boundary_condition(x_data) - model(x_data)))
total_loss = pde_loss + boundary_loss
gradients = tape.gradient(total_loss, model.trainable_variables)
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(gradients, model.trainable_variables))
if epoch % 1000 == 0:
print(f"Epoch {epoch}, Total Loss: {total_loss.numpy()}, PDE Loss: {pde_loss.numpy()}, Boundary Loss: {boundary_loss.numpy()}")
# Plotting the results
x_test = np.linspace(0, 1, 1000)[:, None]
u_pred = model(x_test)
plt.plot(x_test, u_pred, label='Predicted')
plt.plot(x_data, u_data, 'ro', label='True')
plt.xlabel('x')
plt.ylabel('u')
plt.legend()
plt.show()This code will be for solving partial differential equations in one dimension. To extend the range of applications, PDEs and conditions should be applied to the functions pde(), initial_condition() and boundary_condition(). In addition, the structure of the neural network can be modified and the hyperparameters can be adjusted for different problems.
Challenges and measures for physically informed neural networks (PINNs).
Physically Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are an excellent method, but face several challenges. The challenges of PINNs and measures to address them are described below.
1. accurate incorporation of physical equations:
Challenge: PINNs requires the incorporation of physical equations into the loss function, which can be difficult to do accurately. In particular, when dealing with non-linear equations and complex boundary conditions, this can lead to inaccuracy and convergence problems.
Solution:
Improve numerical methods: improve the numerical solution of the physical equations and express them in a format suitable for PINNs.
Regularisation: add a regularisation term to the loss function to improve the stability and convergence of the numerical solution.
Simplification of the problem: simplify the physical equations and extend the scope of application of PINNs.
2. the problem of insufficient data:
Challenge: observational data and boundary conditions are needed to train PINNs. However, data may be insufficient for real problems.
Solution:
Use of physics knowledge: data generation based on physics equations can compensate for the lack of training data.
Data augmentation: increase the diversity of the training data by transforming or synthesising existing data.
Semi-supervised learning: where only some data are available, and where some of the physical equations are known, this information is used to supplement the training.
3. computational efficiency issues:
Challenge: training and inference of PINNs requires extensive computational resources and can be computationally expensive.
Solution:
High-performance computing: utilise high-performance computing resources to parallelise and accelerate training and inference of PINNs.
Algorithm optimisation: optimise algorithms and numerical methods to improve computational efficiency.
Model simplification: adjust model parameters and architecture to reduce computational costs.
4. generalisation performance issues:
Challenge: PINNs tend to over-fit the training data, which may degrade generalisation performance.
Solution:
Regularisation: use regularisation methods to reduce model complexity.
Cross-validation: use methods such as cross-validation to assess the generalisation performance of the model.
Data diversity: increase the diversity of the training data to improve generalisation performance.
Reference Information and Reference Books
More information on the combination of simulation and machine learning can be found in “Simulation, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence” and “Artificial Life and Agent Technology. See also “Simulation, Data Science, and Artificial Intelligence” and “Artificial Life and Agent Technology. Reinforcement learning techniques that take a simulation approach are described in “Theory and Algorithms of Various Reinforcement Learning Techniques and Their Implementation in Python” and the stochastic generative model approach described in “About Stochastic Generative Models“.
Practical Simulations for Machine Learning” as a reference book.
“Reservoir Simulations: Machine Learning and Modeling“
“Machine Learning in Modeling and Simulation: Methods and Applications“
“Statistical Modeling and Simulation for Experimental Design and Machine Learning Applications“
コメント