Bow tie analysis and ontology, AI technology

Machine Learning Artificial Intelligence Digital Transformation Problem Solving and Thinking Process DX Case Studies Workflow & Services Technologies Life tips & Miscellaneous Navigation of this blog
Bowtie Analysis

Bowtie analysis is a risk management technique that is used to organise risks in a visually understandable way. The name comes from the fact that the resulting diagram of the analysis resembles the shape of a bowtie.

The bow tie analysis consists of the following elements

1. hazard: the central element, which is the source of risk. For example, hazardous chemicals or hot equipment.

2. top Event: the first significant event triggered by a hazard, which is also the ‘trigger’ of the risk, e.g. a chemical spill.

3. threats: the factors that cause the Top Event to occur. Examples include equipment failure or human error.

4. barriers: measures taken to prevent threats from leading to the Top Event, including equipment maintenance, warning systems, training, etc.

5.Consequences:  These are the effects or consequences that occur after the Top Event has occurred. Examples include environmental pollution and personal injury.

6. recovery measures: measures to prevent worsening of consequences after a top event has occurred, for example, emergency response plans and evacuation procedures.

The advantages of a bow-tie analysis may include the following

  • Easy to understand visually: bow-tie diagrams visually organise complex information on risk management and make it easier for everyone to understand.
  • Clarifies the relationship between risks and countermeasures: by bringing together threats, barriers, consequences and recovery measures in one diagram, the entire risk management process is better understood.
  • Useful as a communication tool: using diagrams to explain risk management facilitates communication within the organisation and promotes shared risk awareness.

Bow tie analysis is a very useful method for organising how risks arise and how they should be dealt with, especially in situations where risks are diverse and complex.

Bow tie analysis and ontology

The combination of bow-tie analysis and ontologies could lead to more effective structuring and sharing of knowledge in risk management.

Ontologies, described in ‘Ontology technology’, are models for the formal representation of concepts and relationships in a particular field and are used in knowledge management, artificial intelligence and information systems to define the meaning of data and information and to show how they are related. For example, ontologies in the medical field can show how concepts such as diseases, symptoms and treatments are related.

The combination of bow-tie analysis and ontology provides the following benefits

1. systematisation of risk management knowledge: ontologies can be used to systematically organise concepts related to risk management (e.g. hazards, threats, barriers, consequences, recovery measures, etc.) and clarify the interrelationships between each element

2. consistent use of terminology: ontologies ensure that terms and concepts in risk management are used consistently and facilitate communication between different teams and departments

3. automation and reasoning possibilities: ontologies make it possible to automate parts of the risk management process and to use reasoning engines to discover new risks and responses. For example, if a particular threat is associated with multiple hazards, new risk scenarios can be identified based on the relationships.

4. managing complex risk scenarios: while bow tie analysis tends to focus on single risk scenarios, ontologies can be used to efficiently manage multiple risk scenarios and their interactions.

Bow tie analysis is a practical tool for risk management, while ontologies help organise knowledge and semantic associations, which, when combined, make knowledge sharing and utilisation in risk management more effective, even for complex risk scenarios.

Bow tie analysis and AI technology

The combination of bow tie analysis (bow tie analysis) and AI technology is a highly effective approach to enhancing risk management and predictive analytics and designing effective responses to risk AI technology can support the implementation and use of bow tie analysis in the following ways.

1. analysing and predicting risk data:
Machine learning: AI machine learning algorithms can be used to learn patterns from historical accident data and risk cases to predict the probability of risk occurrence and the degree of impact. For example, AI can predict from historical data that threats will occur more frequently under certain conditions and assess the effectiveness of barriers.
Anomaly detection: AI can detect anomalies in normal operational data, thereby enabling early detection of unusual risk factors and undiscovered threats and expanding the threat list in bow tie analysis.

2. automated risk assessment and simulation:
Automatic generation of risk scenarios: using AI, different risk factors and combinations of barriers can be automatically simulated and the most risky scenarios and their mitigation measures can be presented. This enables risk managers to consider response measures more efficiently.
Simulation and modelling: AI can help simulate risk scenarios and predict how effective certain barriers and recovery measures will be. For example, digital twin technology can be used to simulate the impact of a risk event in a virtual environment, and the results can be used to consider measures to strengthen barriers.

3. knowledge storage and sharing:
Knowledge graphs and ontologies: AI can organise the vast amount of data on risk management and build knowledge graphs and ontologies to systematise the knowledge used in bow tie analysis. This allows historical examples and best practices to be accumulated and used to analyse new risk scenarios.
Natural language processing (NLP): AI natural language processing techniques can be used to extract key information from documents and reports relevant to risk management, which can then be automatically categorised and organised as elements of a bow tie analysis. This enables risk factors to be identified and barrier measures to be devised quickly.

4. real-time risk monitoring and alerting:
Real-time data integration: AI can collect and analyse real-time data from IoT sensors and other data sources and monitor potential risks based on butterfly tie analysis; if AI detects abnormal data patterns, it can automatically alert and enable immediate action to be taken.

5. decision support:
AI decision support: when selecting the best option among multiple risk scenarios and response measures, AI can analyse the risks and benefits and suggest the most effective response measures. This enables decision-makers to make evidence-based choices quickly.

Combining bow-tie analysis with AI technology makes risk management more sophisticated and effective, and AI can enhance bow-tie analysis in various aspects, such as risk prediction, simulation, knowledge management, real-time monitoring and decision support, to help companies and organisations respond quickly and appropriately to risk support them to respond quickly and appropriately to risk.

Reference information and reference books

The Operational Excellence Library; Mastering Bowtie Analysis

Ontology Modeling in Physical Asset Management

 

 

 

 

 

第六章文化的要素と規制的要素を統合したBowtie。ハンドライティングから厳密化へについて。

6.1 Introduction: Organizational and Cultural Influences in Incidents
6.2 Risk Analysis
    6.2.1 Risk Analysis and Risk Assessment
    6.2.2 Risk Management and Safety Management Systems
    6.2.3 FJORDS: Formal, Justified, Organized, Rigorous, Disciplined, and Structured
6.3 Bowties
    6.3.1 Analysis of a Bowtie
    6.3.2 Escalation Factors: The Second Level of Analysis
    6.3.3 Management Controls at Level 2
    6.3.4 Distinguishing Cultural and Organizational Factors
    6.3.5 Contracting Out and Partnering as Level 3 Phenomena
    6.3.6 Individual Accountabilities
6.4 Using the Bowtie to Extend Our Understanding of Safety Management
    6.4.1 Criticality of Barriers
    6.4.2 Common Mode Failure
6.5 Integration with Incident Analysis and Reporting Systems
    6.5.1 Incident Investigation
    6.5.2 Reporting Systems
    6.5.3 Integration with Audit Programs
6.6 Note for Practitioners
    6.6.1 Correct Top Events Are Crucial
    6.6.2 Sparseness
    6.6.3 Completeness
    6.6.4 Level 1 Simple Bowties for Frontline Staff
6.7 Conclusion

コメント

タイトルとURLをコピーしました