Most AI platforms are designed around a single goal: building smarter models.
Improve accuracy.
Increase inference speed.
Raise automation rates.
There is nothing inherently wrong with this.
However, in real-world decision environments, a far more fundamental question emerges:
Where does judgment reside?
Is it inside the model weights?
Is it embedded in the code?
Or is it hidden within implicit operational rules?
What I propose is a machine learning architecture that answers this question structurally.
It does not place the model at the center.
It places judgment at the center.
And most importantly:
Judgment does not remain inside the model.
It is externalized.
That is the core design philosophy of the Decision-Oriented Signal Platform.
The Structure and Limits of Conventional AI Platforms
A typical machine learning system follows a familiar pattern:
Collect data.
Train models.
Expose inference APIs.
Produce scores.
Apply business logic thresholds.
At first glance, this seems rational.
But this structure contains a fundamental problem.
Thresholds become implicit.
Boundaries are buried in code.
Judgment becomes model-dependent.
It becomes unclear who decided what—and why.
In other words, judgment is absorbed into the system.
As models grow more sophisticated, accountability becomes less visible.
From Model-Centric to Structure-Centric Design
The Decision-Oriented Signal Platform separates the architecture into distinct layers:
Observed facts (Event)
Model-generated inference outputs (Signal)
Explicit decision boundaries (Contract)
Execution and state control (Execution Control)
Traceability and reproducibility (Audit Layer)
The crucial point is this:
Models are merely Signal generators.
A Signal is a probabilistic or continuous output—
a demand forecast, a risk probability, an anomaly score, a confidence estimate.
A Signal is not a decision.
It is an input to a decision.
Using LLMs Without Connecting Them Directly to Decisions
Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful.
They handle unstructured data.
They understand context.
They generalize in zero-shot and few-shot scenarios.
But they are also:
Probabilistic and non-deterministic.
Capable of hallucination.
Sensitive to distribution shifts.
If LLM outputs are directly connected to operational decisions, instability flows into business processes.
In this architecture, LLMs are treated as Signal generators.
Their outputs are structured.
They are validated against Contracts.
Judgment is performed at the Contract layer.
This enables both flexibility and structural safety.
That is the decisive difference from conventional AI platforms.
Judgment Resides in the Contract Layer
In this design, judgment is explicitly defined within Contracts.
Which signals are referenced.
What ranges are acceptable.
When to halt execution.
When to escalate to humans.
When to transition between operational states.
These are not embedded in model weights.
They are defined as explicit, versionable contracts.
Judgment becomes a designed, inspectable, and manageable object.
Models can change.
LLMs can be introduced.
The decision structure remains stable.
That stability is the architectural strength.
What This Structure Enables
By separating signals from judgment, capabilities become possible that are difficult to achieve in traditional ML systems:
Safe integration of LLMs and conventional ML
Model replacement without operational disruption
Structural resilience in cold-start conditions
Stage-based trust and permission models
Built-in auditability and regulatory alignment
Explicit accountability for decision boundaries
This is not merely a scoring engine.
It is a platform for designing and operating decision structures.
The Axis of AI Competition Is Shifting
AI competition is no longer defined solely by model performance.
The real differentiation lies in whether an organization can design its decision structure.
Not placing systems on top of models—
but placing them on top of decision logic.
Flexible yet robust.
Continuously improvable.
Explainable.
Accountable.
The Decision-Oriented Signal Platform represents a structural approach to building such AI systems.
This is not about accuracy alone.
It is about designing the conditions under which AI can be responsibly used in society.
Repository
A summary of this architecture and design philosophy is available here:
👉 https://github.com/masao-watanabe-ai/Decision-Oriented-Signal-Platform
Introducing LLMs and machine learning models is no longer difficult.
What remains difficult is deciding how to structure their use.
Instead of embedding judgment inside models,
externalize it.
Design it.
Manage it.
AI is not trusted by accident.
Trust is created by design.
コメント