Overviews of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a type of reinforcement learning algorithm and a policy optimization method, which is based on the policy gradient method and designed for improved stability and high performance. The main outlines of PPO are described below.
1. policy optimization method:
The goal of PPO is to update the policy to maximize the reward.
2. trust region constraint:
The PPO introduces a trust region constraint to achieve stable learning. This constraint prevents new policies from making too many changes relative to old policies. This constraint prevents overly large policy changes and reduces learning instability.
3. clipping method:
PPO uses the clipping method to keep the ratio of old policies to new policies within constraints. The clipping method limits policy updates within the trust region.
4. importance sampling:
The PPO reuses old data with old policies and generates new data with new policies when collecting empirical data. This method allows for effective reuse of previously collected data.
5. use of value functions:
PPOs can use state value functions as part of the policy gradient method. Through the value function, the advantage (the difference between the expected return on action and the prediction of the value function) is calculated and used to update the policy.
6. simple and high performance:
PPO is known for its ability to achieve stable, high-performance results despite its relatively simple algorithm, making it applicable to a variety of reinforcement learning tasks and a relatively easy method to implement.
PPO is widely used for practical reinforcement learning tasks because it is more stable and easier to train successfully than other policy optimization methods, and several derivative versions of PPO have been proposed, making it a method that can be tailored to specific tasks.
Algorithm used for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
The algorithm used for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a method of stabilizing and optimizing policy by using Trust Region Constraints as part of the Policy Optimization method (Policy Optimization). The following are the basic principles of the PPO algorithm. The basic steps of the PPO algorithm are described below.
1. Initialization:
Initialize the initial policy (pi_{theta}) by random or pre-training.
Save the previous policy (pi_{text{old}} leftarrow pi_{theta}).
2. episode collection:
The agent collects episodes in the environment, collecting actions and rewards in each state during the episode.
3. advantage estimation:
Calculate the advantage in each state, where the advantage represents the difference between the expected return of the action and the predicted state value.
4. optimization of the objective function:
Update the policy parameter \(\theta\) to maximize the objective function \(J(\theta)\), where the objective function is defined as
\[J(\theta) = \mathbb{E} \left[ \min\left(\frac{\pi_{\theta}(a|s)}{\pi_{\text{old}}(a|s)} A(s, a), \text{clip}(\frac{\pi_{\theta}(a|s)}{\pi_{\text{old}}(a|s)}, 1 – \epsilon, 1 + \epsilon) A(s, a)\right)\right]\]
where \(s\) is the state, \(a\) is the action, \(A(s, a)\) is the advantage, \(\pi_{\theta}(a|s)\) is the new policy, \(\pi_{\text{old}}(a|s)\) is the old policy and \(\epsilon\) is the clipping threshold, which limits the policy change within the trust region.
5. policy updates:
Update the policy based on the new policy parameter \(\theta\), usually using the gradient or conjugate gradient method.
6. Convergence Decision:
The algorithm continues or terminates after checking to see if the convergence conditions have been met. In general, convergence is considered to have occurred when a certain number of episodes or reward thresholds have been achieved.
7. loop:
Repeat steps 2 through 6 to continue improving the policy.
The main feature of PPO will be that the trust region constraint constrains policy updates to ensure stability. It also uses Advantage to calculate the difference between reward and state value, which is used to update the policy. This allows PPO to achieve both learning stability and high performance.
Example implementation of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
An example implementation of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is presented; PPO is a relatively simple algorithm that can be implemented using Python and OpenAI Gym, a reinforcement learning library. The following is a basic implementation sketch of PPO.
import tensorflow as tf
import gym
import numpy as np
# Setting up the environment
env = gym.make('CartPole-v1')
state_dim = env.observation_space.shape[0]
num_actions = env.action_space.n
# Definition of Neural Network Architecture
def build_actor_critic_network(state_dim, num_actions):
# Build a network of Actors and Critics
# Hyperparameter settings for PPO algorithm
num_epochs = 10
num_steps = 2048
clip_epsilon = 0.2
learning_rate = 0.001
gamma = 0.99
lambda_value = 0.95
# Model initialization
model = build_actor_critic_network(state_dim, num_actions)
optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate)
# Main training loop
for epoch in range(num_epochs):
state = env.reset()
done = False
step = 0
while step < num_steps:
# Collection of empirical data
states = []
actions = []
rewards = []
values = []
for t in range(num_steps):
action_prob, value = model(state[None, :])
action = np.random.choice(num_actions, p=action_prob[0])
next_state, reward, done, _ = env.step(action)
states.append(state)
actions.append(action)
rewards.append(reward)
values.append(value)
state = next_state
if done:
break
# Calculation of last state value
_, last_value = model(state[None, :])
# Calculating Advantage and Return
advantages = []
returns = []
advantage = 0
for i in range(len(rewards) - 1, -1, -1):
delta = rewards[i] + gamma * last_value[0] * (1 - int(done)) - values[i]
advantage = delta + gamma * lambda_value * (1 - int(done)) * advantage
advantages.insert(0, advantage)
last_value = values[i]
returns.insert(0, advantage + values[i])
states = np.array(states)
actions = np.array(actions)
returns = np.array(returns)
advantages = np.array(advantages)
# Calculation of the objective function of PPO
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
action_prob, values = model(states)
old_action_prob, _ = model(states)
action_masks = tf.one_hot(actions, num_actions)
chosen_action_prob = tf.reduce_sum(action_prob * action_masks, axis=1)
old_action_prob = tf.reduce_sum(old_action_prob * action_masks, axis=1)
ratio = chosen_action_prob / old_action_prob
clipped_ratio = tf.clip_by_value(ratio, 1 - clip_epsilon, 1 + clip_epsilon)
actor_loss = -tf.reduce_mean(tf.minimum(ratio * advantages, clipped_ratio * advantages))
critic_loss = 0.5 * tf.reduce_mean(tf.square(returns - values))
total_loss = actor_loss + critic_loss
# Gradient update
gradients = tape.gradient(total_loss, model.trainable_variables)
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(gradients, model.trainable_variables))
step += len(states)
print(f'Epoch: {epoch}, Total Reward: {sum(rewards)}')
# Able to use trained models to make inferences
This code is an example of a basic implementation of a PPO in a CartPole-v1 environment; a detailed implementation of a PPO would include the architecture of the policy and value networks, hyperparameters, data collection strategy, policy update strategy, reward preprocessing, etc., and the performance of the PPO requires a variety of adjustments and optimizations to maximize the
Challenge for Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
While Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is a high-performance and stable algorithm in reinforcement learning, several challenges exist. The main challenges of PPO are described below.
1. hyperparameter tuning:
PPO involves several hyperparameters (learning rate, clip threshold, entropy coefficient, etc.) and requires proper adjustment of these hyperparameters. If improperly adjusted, learning may not converge or convergence may be slow.
2. sampling efficiency:
The PPO collects empirical data and uses the collected data to update the measures. Data collection can be time consuming, and developing efficient data collection methods is a challenge.
3. environmental dependence:
PPO performance is task and environment dependent. Some tasks require a particularly high degree of coordination, and common hyperparameter settings may not apply.
4. stability:
While PPO is a stable algorithm, it may require additional innovations to improve learning stability. For example, techniques such as reward scaling and batch normalization may be used.
5. data correlation:
Data collected in a PPO may be correlated over time, and highly correlated data may adversely affect the learning of the network. To address this, appropriate data sampling strategies are needed.
6. balance between exploration and exploitation:
PPO requires a balance between exploration and exploitation (actions based on known measures), with excessive exploration slowing convergence and insufficient exploration potentially leading to convergence to a locally optimal solution.
Improved versions of PPO and derived algorithms have been proposed to address these issues. In addition, hyperparameter adjustment and customization for specific tasks are commonly performed in response to the environment. Although PPO has been used successfully for many reinforcement learning tasks, various innovations and adjustments are needed to improve performance and ensure stability.
Addressing the Challenges of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO)
Several methods and improvements have been proposed to address the challenges of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). The following describes those approaches to PPO.
1. hyperparameter optimization:
Automatic hyperparameter optimization techniques and grid search are used to adjust hyperparameters. Hyperparameter optimization helps to find the optimal hyperparameter settings to improve PPO performance.
2. reward scaling:
Use reward scaling to adjust the reward range and stabilize learning. For example, scaling rewards to a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1 would be common.
3. addressing environmental dependence:
PPO performance is task- and environment-dependent, requiring task-specific adjustments and algorithm modifications. Domain adaptation techniques, for example, can be useful, especially for advanced tasks.
4. stability improvement:
Techniques such as reward scaling, batch normalization, reward function design, and reward clipping are used to improve PPO stability.
5. data correlation:
Introduce experience replay and transition randomness to reduce data correlation.
6. exploration/utilization balance:
To balance exploration and exploitation, we will use the epsilon-greedy measures described in “Overview of the epsilon-greedy method (epsilon-greedy),” and Examples of Algorithms and Implementations in “Overview of Curiosity-Driven Exploration. Algorithms and Examples of Implementations“. This allows for effective exploration.
7. introduction of more advanced algorithms:
Improved versions of PPO and derived algorithms as described in “Overview of Trust Region Policy Optimization (TRPO) and Examples of Algorithms and Implementations“, ACKTR as described in “Overview of ACKTR and Examples of Algorithms and Implementations“, Soft (SAC) described in “Overview, Algorithms, and Examples of Soft Actor-Critic (SAC)“, and DDPG described in “Overview, Algorithms, and Examples of Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG)” can be introduced to improve performance on a specific task.
References and Reference Books
Details of reinforcement learning are described in “Theories and Algorithms of Various Reinforcement Learning Techniques and Their Python Implementations. Please also refer to this page.
A reference book is “Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, Second Edition.
“Deep Reinforcement Learning with Python: With PyTorch, TensorFlow and OpenAI Gym“
コメント