Overview of ReAct(Reasoning and Acting)
ReAct is one of the prompt engineering methods described in “Overview of Prompt Engineering and its Use” and is also used in the scene of LangChain agent utilization described in “Agents and Tools in LangChain “ReAct“.
ReAct is a coined word from “Reasoning + Acting,” and in the ReAct framework, the following sequence of processing is performed.
Step 1: Think about the action (Act) and reason (Reason) necessary to generate output to the task.
Step 2: Based on the results obtained from the action based on this thinking, the next necessary action and its reason are thought again.
Step 3: Repeat the process, ending when the final answer is generated.
For ReAct, the paper “ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Models” is reported. The following figure shows how it works.
Looking at ReAct on the right side of the figure, one can read that Thought (Think), Act, and Obs (Observation) are repeated, which would eventually yield the correct solution. In addition, the following three actions are designed for Act, and the model selects the actions.
Search: Returns the first five sentences of the Wikipedia page for the corresponding word if it exists, otherwise suggests the top five similar words.
Lookup: returns sentences containing the word (mimicking the Ctrl+F function)
Finish: Finish the task
Specific examples of the response process are provided in the paper.
- Question: What is the elevation range of the area where the eastern side of the Colorado orogenic belt extends? - Thought 1: We need to search for Colorado orogenic belt to find the area where the eastern side of the Colorado orogenic belt extends and to find its elevation range. - Action 1: Search for [Colorado orogenic belt]. (Search) - Observation 1: The Colorado Orogenic Belt is an orogenic belt consisting of Colorado and surrounding areas. - Thought 2: There is no mention of the Eastern Region. So we need to look into the eastern sector. - Action 2: Look up [eastern sector]. (Lookup) - Observation 2: (1 search result) The eastern sector extends into the High Plains and is called the Central Plains orogenic zone. - Thought 3: The eastern part of the Colorado orogenic belt extends into the High Plains. So I need to search the High Plains to determine its elevation range. - Action 3: Search for [High Plains]. (Search) - Observation 3: The High Plains points to one of two different land masses. - Thought 4: Need to search for High Plains (U.S.). - Action 4: Search for [High Plains (United States)]. (Search) - Observation 4: The High Plains is part of the Great Plains. The High Plains are approximately 1,800 to 7,000 feet (550 to 2,130 m) in elevation from east to west. - Thought 5: The answer is 1,800 to 7,000 feet because the High Plains rise in elevation from about 1,800 to 7,000 feet. - Action 5: 1,800 to 7,000 ft. (Finish)
This is an iterative process of thinking → action → observing the results for a question task, ultimately outputting answers 1,800-7,000ft.
To what extent does ReAct improve the accuracy of the answers, ReAct’s accuracy evaluation within the paper is done on tasks on several benchmark datasets. The following table shows the results for two datasets, HotpotQA and Fever.
The CoT being compared here with ReAct is an example of “LLM Chain-of-Thought Prompting” (multi-stage reasoning), which is one of the applications of prompt engineering.
In HotpotQA, ReAct by itself is only slightly inferior to CoT. The paper discusses the difference in behavior between ReAct and CoT, including this point, and the problems with each. The paper states that the problem with CoT is that it “generates irrelevant text,” while ReAct “repeats previously performed thoughts and actions,” which leads to errors.
The report also states that ReAct + CoT-SC (SC: Self-Consistency) is a good combination for prompts only, and that ReAct is best for fine tuning. As for fine tuning, it is related to the total number of parameters, and the effect of ReAct is larger for larger models.
Algorithms related to ReAct (Reasoning and Acting)
Algorithms related to ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) are used in the development of AI systems that aim to integrate reasoning and action. The relevant algorithms are described below.
1. Markov Decision Process (MDP): The Markov Decision Process as described in “Overview of Markov Decision Processes (MDP) and Examples of Algorithms and Implementations” is a framework for modeling action selection problems that take into account stochastic state transitions and rewards, and represents the process by which an agent acts in an environment and receives the resulting transitions and rewards. In some cases, ReAct uses this MDP as a basis for determining the optimal action based on the results of inference.
2 Reinforcement Learning: Reinforcement learning is a method in which an agent learns through interaction with its environment, where the agent learns to maximize the rewards resulting from its actions and obtains optimal behavioral strategies, 2. in some cases, optimal behavior is learned using reinforcement learning algorithms integrated with inference.
3. Bayesian Inference: Bayesian inference is a method of reasoning about unknown events using probabilistic models and observed data; ReAct uses Bayesian inference to model the inference process and make decisions that account for uncertainty.
4. Multi-Agent Systems: A multi-agent system is a system in which multiple agents collaborate to solve a problem by influencing each other. In some cases, knowledge and actions are generated.
5. Deep Reinforcement Learning: ReAct utilizes reinforcement learning algorithms based on deep neural networks to integrate inference and action. utilized in some cases to integrate inference and action.
These algorithms contribute to the ability of AI systems to integrate reasoning and action to make more effective and flexible decisions and to adapt to a variety of complex situations.
Application of ReAct (Reasoning and Acting)
The following are examples of where ReAct can be applied.
1 Autonomous robots: Autonomous robots need to understand their environment and choose appropriate actions based on that understanding; using the ReAct approach, robots can reason and take optimal actions based on sensor data and situations; for example, autonomous vehicles can reason about surrounding traffic and road conditions and select appropriate speeds and routes.
2. smart city management: In a smart city, a variety of sensors and data are collected; ReAct enables these data to be analyzed and used to make decisions such as traffic guidance, optimizing energy efficiency, and improving public services, for example, guiding traffic to congested areas or emergency response, and so on.
3. medical diagnosis: medical diagnosis requires inferring diseases from patient symptoms and test results and proposing appropriate treatments; with ReAct, medical AI can infer diseases based on patient information and propose treatment plans tailored to the latest treatment guidelines and individual patient characteristics.
4. Optimization of financial transactions: In financial transactions, it is necessary to construct optimal trading strategies, taking into account market fluctuations and complex trading conditions; with ReAct, market data and trends can be inferred to balance risk and return.
5. robotic manufacturing and assembly: In the manufacturing industry, optimization of parts and processes is important, and ReAct makes it possible to establish efficient production processes by inferring the placement of parts on the production line and the optimization of the manufacturing process. Assembly robots can also reason about the placement of parts and assembly methods to assemble products more efficiently.
6. game AI: Game AI needs to understand the in-game situation and optimize its play; with ReAct, it can reason about the in-game information and develop optimal responses and strategies for the player.
In the ReAct approach, the integration of reasoning and action allows AI systems to make more flexible and effective decisions and increase their ability to adapt to complex situations.
Examples of ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) implementations
There are many different approaches to implementing ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) to achieve the integration of reasoning and action. Some specific implementation examples are described below.
1. integration of Markov decision processes (MDPs) and reinforcement learning: ReAct can be implemented by combining Markov decision processes (MDPs) and reinforcement learning. For example, the following steps can be implemented using a reinforcement learning environment such as OpenAI Gym.
Definition of State: Define the state of the environment in which the agent will act.
Define Actions: Define a list of actions that the agent can take.
Setting the Reward: Define the reward that the agent will receive as a result of its actions.
Solve the MDP using reinforcement learning algorithms such as Q-Learning: Use inference to estimate the state and select actions.
For more details, see also “An Example Implementation of Integrating Reinforcement Learning with Markov Decision Processes (MDPs)“.
2. Integration of inference and action using Bayesian networks: Bayesian networks are a powerful tool to represent uncertainty and to perform inference.
Construction of a Bayesian network: Represent states, actions, rewards, etc. as nodes and perform inference.
Decision making using Bayesian inference: The agent uses the Bayesian network to determine the optimal action.
Integration with data: The agent acts and updates the Bayesian network using data obtained from the environment.
For more details, see “Implementation of ReAct by Integrating Reasoning and Action with Bayesian Networks“.
3. ReAct with Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL): Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) is a reinforcement learning technique that uses deep learning to represent states and actions.
Representing states using neural networks: design neural networks to represent states.
Perform reinforcement learning: use DRL algorithms such as Policy Gradient method (Policy Gradient) to learn behaviors.
Integrate inference and action: use neural networks to infer and select actions based on the results.
See “Implementing ReAct with Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL).”
4. ReAct with multi-agent systems: When multiple agents cooperate to solve a problem, a multi-agent system is used.
Each agent performs reasoning and selects its own action.
Implement mechanisms for sharing information and cooperation among agents.
Evaluate the performance of the entire multi-agent system and learn the optimal behavior.
For details, please refer to “Implementation of ReAct in a Multi-Agent System“.
ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) Cahllenge and Measures to Address Them
The following is a discussion of ReAct (Reasoning and Acting) issues and measures to address them.
1. adaptation to complex environments:
Challenge: ReAct systems must integrate reasoning and action in complex environments, and selecting appropriate actions while coping with environmental change and uncertainty can be a difficult task.
Solution: Use reinforcement learning or deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to make decisions in complex state spaces. Another approach is to use methods such as Model Predictive Control (MPC) to predict future states and determine optimal actions, or to utilize a multi-agent system, where multiple agents cooperate with each other to solve the problem.
2. the sample efficiency problem:
Challenge: Integration of inference and action may require a large amount of data and samples, which reduces learning efficiency.
Solution: Use data reuse and efficient sampling techniques to improve learning efficiency. Also, weight reduction and acceleration techniques could be used to enable real-time decision making. 3.
3. data scarcity and domain adaptation:
Challenge: Sufficient amounts of training data may not be available for certain environments or tasks, and adaptation to different environments or tasks may be difficult.
Solution: One may utilize Transfer Learning to leverage knowledge learned in other tasks or environments, or use domain adaptation techniques to improve the ability to adapt to new environments or tasks.
4. lack of accountability and transparency:
Challenge: It is difficult to explain how the ReAct system made decisions and the reasons and rationale for those decisions.
Solution: Visualization methods and interpretable AI techniques could be used to visualize and explain the system’s decision-making process, and regulations and governance could be introduced to manage the operation of the ReAct system to increase transparency.
5. end-to-end optimization:
Challenge: Optimizing the ReAct system end-to-end is a challenge in terms of both hardware and software.
Solution: hardware performance improvements and parallel processing techniques could be leveraged to enable real-time integration of inference and action, and software optimization and development of advanced algorithms could improve the performance of the ReAct system.
Reference Information and Reference Books
For details on automatic generation by machine learning, see “Automatic Generation by Machine Learning.
Reference book is “
“
“
“
コメント